Reynolds Number > 20 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

FlexPDE User's Forum » User Postings » Reynolds Number > 20 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Terry J. Hilsabeck (tjhilsabeck)
New member
Username: tjhilsabeck

Post Number: 1
Registered: 08-2003
Posted on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - 05:57 pm:   

Why is FlexPDE restricted to low Reynolds numbers? Is there some way to extend the solution space?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert G. Nelson (rgnelson)
Moderator
Username: rgnelson

Post Number: 22
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 28, 2003 - 07:04 pm:   

FlexPDE imposes no restrictions on the PDE system the user can pose. It's just that in some regimes, the velocity-pressure formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations can become difficult to solve, and fall into a long, grinding attempt to settle on a solution. This happens when the Reynolds number becomes large.

We are not fluid dynamicists, and I cannot give you a mathematical reason for this difficulty. In the high Reynolds number regime, the equations are dominated by the momentum terms, and I suspect that the equations will support many turbulent solutions, making the system non-unique.

There are many ways to formulate flow equations, and I suspect that other formulations, possibly with different fundamental variables, will work successfully in the high Reynolds number regime.
I just can't tell you what those formulations are.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration