Absorbing Boundary Conditions Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

FlexPDE User's Forum » User Postings » Absorbing Boundary Conditions « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

anghel (aanghel)
Junior Member
Username: aanghel

Post Number: 3
Registered: 06-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 26, 2006 - 04:17 am:   

Does anybody knows how to implement absorbing boundary conditions for the time dependent 2D Schroedinger equation
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

anghel (aanghel)
Member
Username: aanghel

Post Number: 4
Registered: 06-2005
Posted on Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 07:37 pm:   

I came back to my question with some clarifying coments since I did not yet get an answer. I want to solve the time dependent Schrodinger equation in 2D. the initial value of the wave function is a gaussian centered somwhere in the problem domain. This gausian wave packet moves an when aproches the boundary it start reflect and interfere if I set normal BC on this boundary. This is not what I want. I want the wave packet to move unperturbed out of the doman, i.e. through the boundary as if it were not there. In the literature this is called absorbing boundary conditions.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert G. Nelson (rgnelson)
Moderator
Username: rgnelson

Post Number: 692
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 08:06 pm:   

Well, what does the literature tell you about the way to pose an absorbing boundary condition?

FlexPDE is just a finite element model builder for partial differential equations. If you know how to do it in a text book, then you know how to do it in FlexPDE.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

anghel (aanghel)
Member
Username: aanghel

Post Number: 5
Registered: 06-2005
Posted on Friday, October 06, 2006 - 05:27 pm:   

The literature does not tell me nothing about. Thatīs why I am asking the community. All you see are nice results with the mention that in order to save memory, absorbing boundary conditions have been imposed on the boundaries. I simply hopped you or someone else has a trick or knows some reference.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert G. Nelson (rgnelson)
Moderator
Username: rgnelson

Post Number: 693
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Friday, October 06, 2006 - 06:45 pm:   

Prof. Backstrom discusses FlexPDE for the Schroedinger equation in his book "Waves by Finite Element Analysis", available from the link on www.pdesolutions.com/bookstore.html.

He gets the same kind of relation as the Sommerfeld condition for electromagnetic waves, namely
natural(Psi_real) = -k*Psi_imag
natural(Psi_imag) = k*Psi_real

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration