Author |
Message |
Richard Boonstra (rboonstra)
New member Username: rboonstra
Post Number: 1 Registered: 01-2006
| Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - 06:51 pm: | |
I am modeling convection in a crucible of molten metal and using the "penalty" parameter to enforce continuity. The convection is not driven by buoyancy but by a gradient of surface tension on the free surface. (The surface tension varies negatively with temperature.) Gravity acts normal to the surface. When I exclude gravity I can get a credible solution. When I add a small amount of gravity (g = 0.001 m/s^2), I get a solution that clearly does not satisfy continuity (flow vectors cross a boundary). If I increase the penalty factor the solution looks better but takes a very long time to converge. Achieving a solution for g = 9.8 m/s^2 seems remote. Any thoughts? Thanks for your help. |
Robert G. Nelson (rgnelson)
Moderator Username: rgnelson
Post Number: 530 Registered: 06-2003
| Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2006 - 05:41 pm: | |
Vectors in a vector plot represent conditions at the root of the vector. It is possible that you are seeing interior vectors that cross the boundary for graphical reasons. Try plotting the surface-normal velocity as an elevation on the boundary or a contour on the surface. Or zoom the vector plot to a very small area near the surface. Or send me the script, and I will look at it.
|
Richard Boonstra (rboonstra)
Member Username: rboonstra
Post Number: 4 Registered: 01-2006
| Posted on Tuesday, February 07, 2006 - 06:30 pm: | |
Thanks. I managed to reformulate the problem in terms of stream function and vorticity, which avoids the difficulty. |