moving mesh Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

FlexPDE User's Forum » User Postings » moving mesh « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mauro Chierici Lopes (chierici)
New member
Username: chierici

Post Number: 2
Registered: 01-2006
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2006 - 07:44 am:   

Hi,
I want to setup a moving mesh problem with the following characteristics:
a) the boundary velocity depends on another scalar variable.
b) the displacement of the moving boundary is allways normal to the boundary.

Thank you.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mauro Chierici Lopes (chierici)
Member
Username: chierici

Post Number: 5
Registered: 01-2006
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2006 - 12:25 pm:   

I start by setup a simple problem but I had problems

1.5 K
cottrel_pseudo2D.pde
"simple moving mesh"
. The program runs for constant boundary velocity, but when the velocity is linked to another variable it does not converge.
How can I solve this problem?
Thank You
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert G. Nelson (rgnelson)
Moderator
Username: rgnelson

Post Number: 516
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2006 - 04:05 pm:   

For some reason your upload has not linked correctly. I cannot download it.
Please try again.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mauro Chierici Lopes (chierici)
Member
Username: chierici

Post Number: 6
Registered: 01-2006
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2006 - 04:15 pm:   

I hope that it functions this time.

application/octet-streamsimple moving mesh
cottrel_pseudo2D_movingmesh.pde (1.5 k)


Thank you.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert G. Nelson (rgnelson)
Moderator
Username: rgnelson

Post Number: 519
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2006 - 05:12 pm:   

I'm not sure what you mean by "does not converge".
There are interpolation errors ~0.001 (ERRLIM) in C on the boundary. You feed these back multiplied by 148 through I into the boundary flux of C. So there is significant noise in all the boundary values. Is this what you mean by "does not converge"?

In the attached file, I have used the average C across the interface to define I, and everything is smooth.

1.9 K
cottrel_2.pde
""
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert G. Nelson (rgnelson)
Moderator
Username: rgnelson

Post Number: 520
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2006 - 05:15 pm:   

Resent file:

1.9 K
cottrel_2.pde
""
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mauro Chierici Lopes (chierici)
Member
Username: chierici

Post Number: 8
Registered: 01-2006
Posted on Friday, January 13, 2006 - 06:13 am:   

Yes. This is my problem. The noise in c amplified in I causes irregular displacement of the interface.
I can't download your upload. Please, resent it or tell me how to obtain the average C.

Thank You.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration